PortfoliosLab logo
ABBNY vs. ^SSMI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ABBNY and ^SSMI is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ABBNY vs. ^SSMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ABBNY:

0.30

^SSMI:

0.27

Sortino Ratio

ABBNY:

0.66

^SSMI:

0.63

Omega Ratio

ABBNY:

1.09

^SSMI:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

ABBNY:

0.48

^SSMI:

0.39

Martin Ratio

ABBNY:

1.47

^SSMI:

1.44

Ulcer Index

ABBNY:

6.68%

^SSMI:

4.66%

Daily Std Dev

ABBNY:

25.91%

^SSMI:

15.68%

Max Drawdown

ABBNY:

-93.98%

^SSMI:

-56.31%

Current Drawdown

ABBNY:

-7.25%

^SSMI:

-8.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBNY achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than ^SSMI's 4.19% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBNY has outperformed ^SSMI with an annualized return of 13.76%, while ^SSMI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.95% annualized return.


ABBNY

YTD

2.26%

1M

8.00%

6M

-3.26%

1Y

6.55%

5Y*

28.81%

10Y*

13.76%

^SSMI

YTD

4.19%

1M

7.49%

6M

2.45%

1Y

2.84%

5Y*

4.52%

10Y*

2.95%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ABBNY vs. ^SSMI — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABBNY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ABBNY is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ABBNY is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ABBNY is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ABBNY is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ABBNY is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ABBNY is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

^SSMI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^SSMI is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^SSMI is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ABBNY vs. ^SSMI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ABBNY Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is comparable to the ^SSMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBNY and ^SSMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ABBNY vs. ^SSMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBNY drawdown since its inception was -93.98%, which is greater than ^SSMI's maximum drawdown of -56.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBNY and ^SSMI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ABBNY vs. ^SSMI - Volatility Comparison

ABB Ltd (ABBNY) and Swiss Market Index (^SSMI) have volatilities of 6.54% and 6.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...